The detailed assessment was a meeting in the nursing home. It was another more detailed checkbox exercise and the necessary criteria were met which should mean a recommendation that the health authority is responsible for meeting all fees. The social worker present at the meeting supported that conclusion but the representative of the health authority who had never met the patient did not and reported to the panel that in her opinion despite the criteria being met there was not a primary health need justifying funding! A week or so later we received a letter confirming that the panel agreed that there should be no funding. They then initiated a peer review of that decision which was a paper exercise to which we could not contribute. Inevitably the peer review agreed with the panel’s decision and so we have now requested an independent review.
The purpose of these blogs is firstly to show that it is possible to obtain none means-tested funding for health care although very little publicity is given to this fact and secondly to demonstrate how difficult it is to pursue. Needless to say the courts have been involved about which more next. My hope is that other people who find themselves in the same position may find our experience helpful.



